These will provide support to economic and societal decision-makers, so they are able to thoughtfully respond to changing environmental conditions to support mitigation and adaptation efforts.
It is hoped that such information will be of value to scientists, engineers, risk assessors, and societal decision-makers so that wise and informed decisions may be made for the handling of e-waste in a safe and effective manner to protect the public health.
A review of studies in Europe and the US by De Graeve et al. [ 69] concluded that economic attractiveness of universal PCV vaccination strategies were dependent on both vaccine cost and willingness of decision makers to adopt a societal perspective.
We adopted a health provider perspective because this information would be important for national health decision makers, and because a wider societal perspective is much more data intensive and would require data that are not easily available in this setting.
Both the cost-benefit method and the societal perspective would in principle be helpful approaches for decision makers, in particular in developing countries.
The current societal and professional context presents a variety of ethical challenges to decision makers.
For instance, requests by decision makers may determine the applied perspective (e.g. societal or sickness funds).
Furthermore, decision makers should capitalize on need-adapted interventions to meet societal conditions in a bid to change men's distorted attitudes toward IPVAW.
Through this study, we hoped to inform decision makers on the priority of public natural space in societal efforts to promote positive emotional well-being among young people.
This value is a relative cost, which depends on decision makers' perceptions of saving lives versus maintenance of daily societal functions.
