so of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "so of" is not correct and does not have a clear meaning in written English.
It is not usable in standard English contexts, as it does not form a coherent expression. Example: "I was thinking so of going to the party, but I changed my mind."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

So of Erin.

The New York Times

If so, of what?

The New York Times

So, of course, it happened.

The New York Times - Arts

So, of course, does Barcelona.

The New York Times - Sports

So, of course, it is.

Independent

So, of course, do movies.

The New York Times

So, of course, those things influence you".

The New Yorker

So of course they act like psychopaths.

The New York Times - Arts

"So of course you want to run.

The New York Times - Sports

So, of course, I never read it.

The New York Times

So, of course, did the losses.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "so of" in your writing. It is generally considered grammatically incorrect and can lead to confusion. Instead, opt for clearer and more precise alternatives like "therefore", "consequently", or rephrase your sentence for better clarity.

Common error

Be cautious of isolating "so of" from larger phrases where it might appear correctly within a different grammatical structure. Always ensure that "so" and "of" work together correctly in your intended context, or choose an alternative phrasing.

Linguistic Context

"So of" does not function as a standard grammatical unit in English. Ludwig AI indicates it's often part of a larger phrase or a grammatical error. It lacks a defined grammatical role on its own and should be avoided in formal writing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Academia

35%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Science

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "so of" is generally considered grammatically incorrect and lacks a clear, standard meaning in English. As Ludwig AI points out, it often appears as part of a larger, potentially flawed grammatical structure. While it may be found in various contexts, including news and academic sources, its presence is usually indicative of an error. It is best to avoid using "so of" and opt for clearer, more precise alternatives such as "therefore", "consequently", or rephrasing the sentence to improve clarity and grammatical correctness. Using alternatives not only enhances clarity but also ensures adherence to standard English grammar conventions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

therefore

This single-word adverb directly indicates a logical consequence or result, avoiding the prepositional phrase construction.

consequently

Similar to "therefore", this emphasizes the result of a preceding action or statement, differing in formality.

thus

A more formal synonym for "therefore", suitable for academic or formal writing, replacing the need for the phrase.

because of that

This phrase explicitly states a reason or cause, providing a clearer causal link than "so of".

as a result

Indicates that something happens due to a preceding event, replacing the ambiguous structure of "so of".

in that case

This offers a conditional consequence, shifting the focus from a general result to a specific condition.

accordingly

Suggests an action is taken in response to a prior situation, providing a more directed consequence.

that being so

This presents a condition upon which a conclusion is based, offering a more explicit logical structure.

given that

Introduces a premise or fact that leads to a conclusion, replacing the vague connection implied by "so of".

for this reason

Clearly indicates the cause behind a statement, providing a more direct and understandable connection.

FAQs

How can I avoid using "so of" in my writing?

To avoid using "so of", consider replacing it with more precise alternatives like "therefore", "consequently", or "as a result", depending on the context.

Is "so of" grammatically correct?

No, "so of" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. It's better to use alternative phrases that clearly express your intended meaning.

What are some alternatives to "so of" for showing cause and effect?

Alternatives for showing cause and effect include "because of that", "for this reason", or simply restructuring your sentence to use more direct causal language.

How does the meaning change when replacing "so of" with alternatives?

Replacing "so of" with alternatives like "therefore" or "consequently" often adds clarity and precision, as these words directly indicate a logical consequence or result, which "so of" fails to do effectively.