Suggestions(1)
Exact(4)
l Current smoking excluded because no ex smoking relative risk available.
o Ex smoking excluded because no current smoking relative risk available.
m Current and ex smoking excluded because no matching pair of relative risks available.
n Current and ex smoking excluded because only available relative risks did not satisfy age criteria.
Similar(56)
We also repeated the analysis of CRP and COPD stratified by smoking excluding those with COPD at baseline.
* Analyses for smoking exclude 23 cases with smoking history unknown.
The controls were 93,250 births randomly selected (10 controls per case) from the source population of singleton births without birth defects or maternal smoking during pregnancy (680 births were excluded due to maternal smoking), excluding births from 25 of 365 townships located in the mountain area where there are no air monitoring stations.
The inclusion criteria for studies were as follows: published in English, investigated associations between smoking and tooth loss and reported the effect size of the association (i.e. literature that employed the variable of smoking only for adjustment and which did not report the effect size of smoking was excluded).
We included factors in multivariable models that may have the potential to confound the association between maternal smoking, and excluded factors that may be acting as causal intermediaries because they are influenced by maternal smoking (e.g., low birth weight) (Cole and Hernan 2002; Greenland and Brumback 2002).
In 1993, Douglas Dockery from the Harvard School of Public Health and colleagues published a study of over 8,000 adults in six US cities suggesting higher levels of fine particles in the air was associated with higher death rates - once smoking was excluded.
Patients with conditions that may delay bone healing like open tibial fractures, diabetes mellitus, and smoking were excluded from this study.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com