Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
The decrease in the percentage of smokers ranged from 3% (primary prevention) to 8% (secondary prevention).
Abstinence rates following group-based CBT interventions with non-pregnant adult smokers ranged from 33 69% [ 41- 43], whereas cessation rates reported among pregnant women were generally lower.
Among women the proportion of current smokers ranged from 43% in the highest social classes (I+II) to 52% in the lowest (IV+V), and among men it ranged from 47%to64%47%to64%
Smoking data were available for all studies and the proportion of current smokers ranged from 7.2% in SOF to 26.0% in Malmö/Umeå, with an overall proportion of 13.2%.
The coefficients for the difference in mental health at follow-up with baseline adjustment, between quitters and continuing smokers, ranged from: regression coefficient B=3.96 (95% CI −1.00 to 8.93) to 3.55 (−1.29 to 8.40; see online supplementary table S4).
In the participating cohorts, the average age of the participants ranged from 49 to 64 years, and the proportion of current smokers ranged from 19to28%8% (Table 1).
Similar(52)
Smokers range from those wealthy enough to afford $35 packs to the rural poor who turn to state tobacco monopolies capable of producing cigarettes starting at 20 cents a pack.
The subjects' average age was 25.4 years (SD: 4.4, range: 18 35), four were smokers, ranging from 5 to 15 cigarettes per day.
The average age for the patients was 36.4 [standard deviation (SD): 9.6, range: 21 49], and 12 were smokers ranging from 8 to 25 cigarettes a day.
(compared to SCLC, 1.7:1 12) and a low recorded smoking history, consistent with that from other EPSCC series, with proportions of smokers ranging from 19% current and 32% ex-smokers 13 to 30% current smokers.
In recent studies that addressed the association between breast cancer and cigarette smoking, however, there was some suggestion of a decreased risk [ 8, 9, 10], especially among current smokers, ranging from approximately 10 to 30% [ 9, 10].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com