Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

smaller accuracy for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "smaller accuracy for" is not correct in standard written English.
It is unclear and does not convey a clear meaning; "smaller accuracy" is not a commonly used expression. Example: "The model demonstrated smaller accuracy for predicting outcomes in complex scenarios."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The differences in accuracies between classes of QTL with different average MAF were more pronounced for the VAR scenario than for the RANDOM scenario, mainly as a result of a smaller accuracy for QTL with a very low average MAF and a much smaller accuracy for QTL with an extremely low average MAF.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Center ranking is generally of low quality, giving small accuracy for all testing percentages.

In fact, the LUT approach shows low accuracy for small ASs.

From reads with 0.15% to 1.5% errors, a decrease in accuracy of 9% was observed, which is also a smaller accuracy drop than measured for metagenomic gene prediction tools.

Specifically, as indicated by smaller omission rates, smaller intrusion rates, larger correspondence rates, and smaller inflation ratios, accuracy for school-breakfast reports was best for prior-24-hour recalls in the morning, and accuracy for school-lunch reports was best for prior-24-hour recalls in the afternoon.

For the nasal class, there were small phone accuracy gains, and for silence, there were small accuracy degradation by template matching, but both changes were small and insignificant.

First trimester screening analytes have low predictive accuracy for pre-eclampsia, small for gestational age and preterm delivery.

With GBLUP, haplotype-based prediction fitted around 7.5 times more covariate effects but with only a small gain in accuracy for protein and mastitis traits, compared with individual marker-based prediction.

They explained the lower accuracy for smaller components by the low concentrations and relatively greater errors in their chemical analysis.

However, in the same study [13], it was shown that the 100-K limit does not cause a noticeable decrease in the "average" conformer model accuracy for smaller and less flexible molecules (i.e., with N NHA ≤35 and N ER ≤15).

This approach can also help provide a greater level of accuracy for smaller selections as relationships are based on larger datasets.

Science

Plosone
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Instead of using "smaller accuracy for", opt for clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives like "lower accuracy for" or "reduced accuracy in". This ensures your writing is easily understood and maintains a professional tone.

Common error

Avoid using "smaller" to describe abstract qualities like accuracy. "Smaller" is typically used for physical dimensions. Instead, use words like "lower", "reduced", or "decreased" to describe a reduction in accuracy.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "smaller accuracy for" attempts to describe a reduction in the level of precision or correctness associated with a particular task or method. However, Ludwig AI indicates this is not standard English and therefore the phrase isn't grammatically functional.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "smaller accuracy for" attempts to describe a reduction in precision, Ludwig AI analysis reveals it as grammatically incorrect. Preferred alternatives include "lower accuracy for" or "reduced accuracy for". Primarily found in scientific contexts, the intended purpose is to communicate a decrease in correctness. To maintain clarity and professionalism, it's crucial to adopt standard grammatical structures and precise language when discussing accuracy in any field.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "smaller accuracy for"?

You can use alternatives like "lower accuracy for", "reduced accuracy for", or "decreased accuracy for" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "smaller accuracy for"?

No, it is not grammatically correct. It's better to use phrases like "lower accuracy for" or "reduced accuracy for".

How can I improve the clarity of my writing when discussing accuracy?

Use precise language and avoid ambiguous terms. Instead of "smaller accuracy", specify the degree of reduction or use more descriptive terms such as "significantly lower accuracy".

What is the difference between "smaller accuracy" and "lower accuracy"?

"Smaller accuracy" is not a standard or grammatically correct phrase. "Lower accuracy" is the preferred and more common way to express a reduction in accuracy.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: