Exact(1)
Bias detection via FISH and CGH, on the other hand, is limited to a mapping resolution of approximately 20 Megabases [ 39, 40], is incapable of detecting small scale errors or distortions and has difficulty detecting homozygous deletions [ 39].
Similar(59)
First of all by working in small scale, any slight error would be magnified – a tiny error in a 30cm long model of Diplodocus representing an animal that may have been more than 25m could easily result in a huge error when scaled up the necessary 90 or so times.
Meanwhile, to preserve the approximation error at a small scale, the reduced evaluation range is divided into uniform segments.
As evident in the error matrix, detecting small scale logging from Landsat data is problematic.
For small scale systems this can be done manually, but the process is time consuming and error-prone.
Questions of amplification-induced error and template bias generated by these methods have previously been addressed through either small scale (SNPs) or large scale (CGH array, FISH) methodologies.
Its small scale feels right.
It's on a small scale.
Petroleum is extracted on a small scale.
Manufacturing took place on a small scale.
On a very small scale.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com