Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
That puts it in the top 34percentt of small blend funds.
The fund returned 11.5percentt, annualized, for the three years through Thursday, placing among the top 12percentt of all small blend funds, which own a mix of small-capitalization growth and value stocks.
The fund returned 24.9percentt a year, on average, for the three years ended Jan . 25 compared with 9.1percentt for its peer group of small blend funds, according to Morningstar Inc.
The fund returned 26.8percentt a year, on average, for the three years through Thursday, versus 7.4percentt for its peers among small blend funds, according to Morningstar Inc.
The fund has returned 12.9percentt a year, on average, for the three years ended on Sept. 28, compared with 6.6percentt for its peers in the small blend category of funds, according to Morningstar Inc.
The fund returned 13.8percentt a year, annualized, for the three years through Thursday, compared with 4.7percentt, on average, for its peer group of small blend funds, which own a mix of growth and value stocks, according to Morningstar Inc.
Similar(52)
The New Yorker's Emily Nussbaum aptly summarized the show's theme as "the danger of thinking too big when your own life feels small". "Blending screwball fizz and sticky melancholy, ['Search Party'] basically invents a new genre: the noir sitcom," she declared.
Small blends the best of online and offline.
With increasing viscosity ratio, smaller blend structures were observed.
The value portfolio, by contrast, which Morningstar classifies as a small-blend fund, has done well during the market downturn, along with other value investments.
The fund returned 16.93 percent a year, on average, for the three years through Aug. 8, compared with 8.11percentt for its peers in the small-blend fund category, according to Morningstar Inc., and 7.73percentt for the Russell 2000, on average, for the three years through July.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com