Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
"slit width" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It refers to the measurement of the width of a slit or narrow opening. It can be used in technical or descriptive contexts, such as in manufacturing, engineering, or in describing the size of an opening in a material. Example: The slit width of the new packaging machine was set to 5 millimeters to ensure the perfect seal of the products.
Exact(60)
All the measurements were done by keeping the parameters constant such as solvent and slit width.
Emission was set at 545 nm (slit width, 20 nm), and excitation was recorded at 480 nm to 510 nm (slit width, 2 nm) [34].
For spectral analysis the spectrofluorometer was set at the scan mode of 1 nm wavelength intervals, emission PMT voltage 600 V, the emission slit width and excitation slit width 5 nm and 5 nm, respectively.
Tryptophans were excited at 295 nm (slit width 1 nm), and emission was monitored from 305 to 400 nm (slit width 3 nm) at 20 °C.
The excitation wavelength for tryptophan was 298 nm (slit width of 5 nm) with an emission signal scanned from 300 to 700 nm (slit width of 5 nm).
Fluorescence was excited at 297 nm (slit width 5 nm) and recorded at 320 or 365 nm (slit width 2.5 nm).
Excitation and emission wavelengths for DPH were 350 and 452 nm, respectively (slit width 10 nm).
Data were recorded in a Perkin Elmer LS 50 B luminescence spectrometer setting an excitation wavelength of 542 nm (slit width of 2.5 nm) and emission of 574 nm (slit width of 5 nm).
The cuvette was illuminated using light at a wavelength of 506 nm (slit width 8 nm) and monitored using fluorescence detection at 526 nm (slit width 8 nm) coupled to FeliX GX software (PTI Inc).
Fluorescence data was acquired on a Varian Cary Eclipse Spectrophotometer using a quartz cell with a path length of 10 mm, excitation slit width of 20 nm, and emission slit width of 20 nm at 20 °C.
Excitation wave length was 475 nm, emission was detected at 555 nm, slit width was 10 nm.
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com