Exact(12)
For other functional analyses, we used the 'GO Slim' classification system provided by TAIR database [ 54].
The GO Slim Classification for Plants, developed at TAIR [ 61] was used to characterize the ESTs functionally.
The GO Slim Classification for Plants, developed at TAIR (http://www.arabidopsis.org/help/helppages/go_slim_help.jsp) was used to characterize the ESTs functionally.
GO Slim Classification analysis revealed a subset of dcCIN genes belong to diverse processes such as DNA damage response, transcription, and cytoplasmic translation.
For the functional analysis of the network, two (2) online tools that perform GO term enrichment analysis (Gorilla [ 60]) and GO slim classification (WebGestalt [ 61, 62]) were used.
From the GO term slim classification it is apparent that the 2374 network's proteins take part in metabolic processes (especially protein modification), biological regulation (especially intracellular protein kinase cascade), apoptotic processes, and intracellular transport.
Similar(48)
Similarly, the genes which fall under the GO slim classifications 'Other enzyme activity' and 'Nucleotide binding' were over represented among the low temperature responsive genes.
We utilized the GO assignments of Arabidopsis gene models (the GO Slim classifications in TAIR) for assignment of putative functional roles to the 37,844 contigs of carnation.
The differences in the distributions of GO slim classifications among the three types of Douglas-fir sequences (I1, IM, and S) were small.
Transcripts with GO slim classifications that are over represented on our list of differentially expressed genes should be representative of the processes and pathways being affected in both the iron efficient and iron inefficient plants.
This test was performed to identify the GO slim terms within each of the three GO slim classifications that were over-or under-represented in the lists of differentially expressed genes in relation to their presence on the soybean Affymetrix® chip.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com