Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(33)
Each of these indices integrates the domains of sleep disturbance, sleep adequacy, shortness of breath, and somnolence into a single score.
10194_2014_1008_MOESM1_ESM.docx Additional file 1 Results of statistical analysis applied to all Medical Outcome Study Scale items: SLPD4: sleep disturbance, SLPSNR1: snoring, SLPSOB1: sleep short of breath or headache, SLPA2: sleep adequacy, SLPS3: sleep somnolence, SLP6: sleep problems index I, SLP9: sleep problems index II, SLPQRAW (sleep quantity -raw). DOCX 44 KB).
Georgetown's Director of Health Education Services Carol Day adds, "We are trying to encourage a campus climate of sleep adequacy by sharing the facts about sleep with students in a variety of ways and urging them to prioritize self-care by not taking on so many things to do that demands on their time exceed the time students have to give.
The MOS domain most affected was sleep adequacy (34.2 [± 24.1]), where higher scores indicate greater sleep adequacy.
The "sleep adequacy" dimension reached the threshold value only for German and Polish versions.
The most affected area was Sleep Adequacy, with a mean score of 27.9.
Similar(27)
Multitrait scaling analysis [ 31] was used to evaluate the structure of the multi-item dimensions (i.e. "sleep disturbance," "adequacy of sleep" and "somnolence" dimensions and sleep problems index) in order to verify that items measured the concept of their hypothesized dimension.
We choose to examine only the SLP6 index, which is a summary of sleep problems based on adequacy, shortness of breath, and somnolence [21].
Problems related to disturbances in sleep onset, maintenance or adequacy.
MOS measures six dimensions of sleep; initiation, maintenance, quantity, adequacy, somnolence, and respiratory impairment.
The MOS Sleep Scale is a self-administered scale measuring specific aspects of sleep (problems with sleep disturbance [initiation and maintenance], adequacy, somnolence, quantity, respiratory impairments and snoring) and is reliable and valid in the general US population [ 16].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com