skills has not improved

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "skills has not improved" is not correct in English.
It should be "skills have not improved" because "skills" is plural. You can use it when discussing the lack of progress or development in someone's abilities or competencies. Example: "Despite the training sessions, her skills have not improved over the past few months."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

It concluded that children's reading skills had not improved in 50 years.

The Guardian

By summer, there's less money for savings and investment skills have not improved.

Forbes

Some possible subtle improvement was observed in LG's higher-order visual functions such as object recognition and part integration, while LG's face perception skills have not improved thus far.

Developmental Science

But here, and in Britain, our skills haven't improved over the years.

Huffington Post

It seems that the Syrian brown bear has always had a penchant for the pool, even if his surfing skills haven't improved much.

Huffington Post

Running a company has not improved my investing skills, which are completely unrelated to being a good leader and strategist.

TechCrunch

Traffic has not improved.

Huffington Post

But Ing says the relationship hasn't improved her language skills because Alex speaks perfect English.

The Guardian

It hasn't improved.

The New York Times - Sports

Consequently, we infer that SS training had not improved the skills of supervisors with respect to these management functions.

Global Health Action

Across a range of skills, people felt that they had improved from merely watching — even when they hadn't yet practiced the skill themselves, and even when they had not improved much at all.

Harvard Business Review

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always ensure subject-verb agreement. Since "skills" is plural, use "have" instead of "has". The correct phrasing is "skills have not improved".

Common error

Avoid using singular verbs with plural subjects. Saying "skills has not improved" is a common error. Remember that plural subjects like "skills" require plural verbs like "have".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "skills has not improved" is an incorrect declarative statement. It attempts to express that abilities or competencies have not shown any positive change, but the grammar is flawed.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "skills has not improved" is grammatically incorrect due to a subject-verb disagreement. The plural noun "skills" requires the plural verb form "have". As Ludwig AI pointed out, the correct phrasing is "skills have not improved". While the intent is clear—to express a lack of progress in abilities—using the correct grammar is crucial for clarity and credibility. Alternative phrases such as "skills have not progressed" or "skills have not advanced" can be used to convey the same meaning with proper grammar.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

skills have not progressed

Replaces "improved" with "progressed", maintaining the plural "have" for grammatical correctness.

skills have not advanced

Substitutes "improved" with "advanced", keeping the plural agreement.

abilities have not improved

Replaces "skills" with "abilities", both referring to someone's competences.

skills have stagnated

Uses "stagnated" to indicate a lack of improvement, emphasizing a standstill in development.

skills have remained unchanged

Indicates that the skills have not changed or gotten better, using a more descriptive term.

competencies have not improved

Replaces "skills" with "competencies", highlighting the lack of improvement.

there's been no skill enhancement

Rephrases the sentence to focus on the absence of "skill enhancement".

proficiency has not improved

Replaces "skills" with "proficiency", focusing on the level of expertise.

skill set has not improved

Refers to "skill set" in singular form. However, this does not imply that all the "skills" included in the "skill set" have stagnated.

expertise has not improved

Replaces "skills" with "expertise", emphasizing the absence of better skills.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "skills has not improved"?

The correct way to phrase this is "skills have not improved" because "skills" is plural and requires the plural form of the verb "have".

What are some alternatives to "skills have not improved"?

You can use alternatives like "skills have not progressed", "skills have not advanced", or "skills have stagnated" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it grammatically correct to say "skills has not improved"?

No, it is not grammatically correct. The correct phrasing is "skills have not improved". Using "has" with the plural noun "skills" is an example of subject-verb disagreement.

How does using "have" instead of "has" change the meaning of "skills has not improved"?

Using "have" instead of "has" does not change the meaning, it corrects the grammar. "Skills have not improved" is grammatically sound, while "skills has not improved" is incorrect.