Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(12)
(A) Vertical pattern in class II skeletal relationship.
Cephalometrically, she exhibited predominant vertical growth (FMA = 31.0°) and a class I skeletal relationship (ANB = 1.5°).
This result could be due to the influence of facial vertical pattern length and severity of the skeletal relationship.
The pooled statistically significant increase of the ANB angle entails an improvement of the Class III skeletal relationship of the maxilla and mandible.
The assessment of the skeletal relationship was based on SNA-SNB, ANB SN^SNP.SNA, SN^GO.GN, S^GO, SNP.SNA^GO.GN, I^SN, and I^FH angles.
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the CBCT-based spatial analysis of the TMJ condylar position as related to the anteroposterior skeletal relationship.
Similar(48)
No significant differences between the two groups were found in vertical and horizontal skeletal relationships.
No significant changes were found concerning vertical skeletal relationships and upper incisor inclination.
Methods: The records of 20 subjects with high-angle skeletal relationships (MPA ≥25°) were examined.
Successful outcomes depend on knowledge of normal facial skeletal relationships, appropriately designed biocompatible implants, and facility with craniofacial techniques.
Therefore, the accurate determination of these values in conjunction with clinical observations could be of great importance for diagnosis and treatment planning in different skeletal relationships.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com