Exact(1)
More moderate effect sizes were evident for internalizing symptoms (g = 0.74), self-appraisal (g = 0.63), externalizing symptoms (g = 0.52), and sexualized behavior (g = 0.49), while small effects were found for measures of coping/functioning (g = 0.44), caregiver outcomes (g = 0.43), and social skills/competence (g = 0.38).
Similar(59)
A variation in particle sizes was evident for individual carriers in AFM measurements, but size ranges appeared to overlap between the types of DNA molecules.
A moderate effect size was evident for DVD/video viewing, a passive pursuit similar to TV viewing [ 39].
After post treatment (8 weeks) and follow-up (3 months) a large effect size was evident for the MBSR group compared to a small decline in the TAU group [ 50].
A moderate effect size was evident for parental beliefs about the influence of EM use on their child's health, developmental and behavioural outcomes such that beliefs about influences were more reflective of current evidence (i.e. TV is detrimental to language development).
While random distributions may have partly reflected small sample sizes, clearly coherent patterns were evident for many groups, indicating a sufficient gradient in environmental conditions.
Significant differences were evident for tumour size (P=0.00002) and vascular invasion (P=0.02417).
Although activation during the final 10 sprints of the protocol was increased significantly with the CGSS in the rectus femoris muscle only, large effect sizes concerning better maintenance of muscle activation were evident for other thigh muscles as well.
No associations with anthropometric characteristics were evident for serous ovarian cancer risk, possibly due to the limited sample size (N=50).
For example, reduced flower size was evident in Hop stunt viroid (HSVd -infected cucumber [ 41] and in cHSVd -infectednfecucumberh Chrysanthemum stunt viroid [ 41].
Even with half the pot still missing, its rough size was evident.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com