Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
Tumor sizes were categorized based on those values known to be critical for prognosis and treatment strategy.
Tumor sizes were categorized to 1 mm, 2 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm,..., 100+ mm, as the background data revealed that many pathologists approximated tumor sizes to the nearest 5 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm,..., 100 mm (data not shown).
Similar(58)
According to Cohen [ 31], effect sizes are categorized as follows: small (0.20 0.49), medium (0.50 0.79), and large effects (0.80 and above).
Effect sizes are categorized as 'Trivial, 'Small' 'Medium' and 'Large' for odds ratios in a similar way to mean differences Although the BB approach offers an alternative approach to analyse and interpret HRQoL effects, it is more complex.
Bubble size was categorized into two types small spherical and large non-spherical bubbles depending on if the equivalent diameter of the bubbles was smaller or larger than 2 mm.
Sample size was categorized as being <100 participants versus 100 or more participants.
Tumor size was categorized as < 1 cm, 1 - 4 cm and > 4 cm.
Practice size was categorized similarly to previously published work [ 19] to allow for comparisons.
Conference size was categorized as n < 1000 persons for small conferences, and n > 1000 for large conferences.
Tumor size was categorized as < 1 cm, 1 to <2 cm, 2 to <3 cm, and ≥3 cm.
Tumor size was categorized into four groups: 0 cm, <0.5 cm, 0.5 to 1 cm, >1 cm.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com