This situation likely reflects a poor choice of candidate genes, resulting from limited insights from biology, poor coverage of genetic variation, the small scale of studies, and the complexity of the trait for which small effect sizes are anticipated.
Increases in maximum cluster size were anticipated because, as sample sizes increase with time, the number of isolates in each cluster would be expected to increase.
A small reduction in the particle size was anticipated, as the fly ash particles were entrained in the CNFs, hence reducing their agglomeration.
At the outset, using Cohen parameters [ 29], a medium effect size was anticipated.
For a successful reduction in cocaine use, an average 25% SDS score reduction (3.75 points reduction for a small to medium effect size) is anticipated.
Based on previous investigation [ 7], a large effect size was anticipated, but to use a conservative approach, sample size was calculated using a medium effect size corresponding to a 25% relative increase in postexercise apoptosis.
The minimum new sample size is anticipated to be in the order of 1125 (375 fFN positive and 750 fFN negative women), but the proportions of each will dictate the exact sample size, as it is anticipated that at least 2 fFN negative women are required to achieve the event rate predicted in 1 fFN positive woman.
Effect sizes and odds ratios (OR) were anticipated effect parameters.
Small to moderate correlations only were anticipated, though significance was likely with this sample size.
However, due to the small physique of the Malay population, smaller sizes had been anticipated in several parameters such as femoral head offset, femoral neck length, and femoral head diameter.
