We therefore chose to use the smaller patch size in our analysis, to include substantial areas of moderately sized patches of the best LPCH habitat.
We also combined these key words to maximize the sample size in our analysis.
Despite the smaller sample size in our analysis, a larger fraction of the variation in substitution rate was explained by maximum lifespan, even though we included non-synonymous sites, which did not show a significant correlation earlier [21].
Thereforefore the positive effect on pain is robust against small sample size in our analysis.
This might be secondary to the limited power due to the relatively small sample size in our analysis.
We wanted to allow for colony size in our analysis so we used incoming forager traffic as a proxy (Couvillon et al. 2008a).
The larger sample size in our analysis allowed us to detect differences in complication rates by vaccination status, which may be undetectable in smaller studies or when the number of unvaccinated persons is low.
To determine if the correlation we observed between microsynteny conservation and disease gene ortholog density was affected by the window size used in our analysis, we repeated our assays using additional window sizes.
