Sentence examples for sizes hazard from inspiring English sources

9 For each question, relevant data were extracted and appropriate statistics were calculated, including effect sizes, hazard ratios (HR), and standardised mortality ratios with 95% CI.

The most useful circulating biomarkers are likely to be relatively stable across testing conditions, easy to measure precisely and reproducibly (low intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients <5 to 10%) and to have fairly significant effect sizes (hazard ratios >1.5).

The exceptions to this are three genome-wide association studies (GWAS) [ 4- 6] and a study from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, which had substantial power to detect associated variants with large effect sizes (hazard ratio (HR) >2) [ 7].

As both of the last-mentioned factors showed relatively large effect sizes (hazard ratios) and have been validated in several previous studied, also these factors were included in the final prognostic model.

While the time to infection differed between children and adults, the effect size (hazard ratios) were very similar (e.g., 3D7 GIA HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.85 2.38 for children and HR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.78 3.28 for adults).. Therefore, age was treated as a confounder in these analyses as it was significantly associated with time-to-infection and growth inhibition (p<0.001).

9p loss had an independent effect on DFS on multivariate analysis model including T-stage, grade, and size (Hazard ratio 6.65; P = 0.021) [ 29].

Lenvatinib PFS benefit was shown in Japanese patients (median PFS: lenvatinib, 16.5 months; placebo, 3.7 months), although significance was not reached, presumably due to sample size (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.10 1.57; P = 0.067).

In univariate survival analyses, tumour size (hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence 1.75; 95% CI 1.21 2.54; P=0.003), and lymph node status (HR for recurrence 1.46; 95% CI 1.13 1.88; P=0.004) were significantly associated with RFS (Table 2).

A population with GI bleeding 3 times larger than evaluated in this study would be necessary to identify the effect size (hazard ratio of 0.7), as seen in the prospective trial.

Univariate Cox-regression analysis for all clinicopathological characteristics and disease-free survival is shown in Table 2. Multivariate regression analysis for all clinicopathological characteristics showed that only tumour size (hazard ratio (HR)=4.8, 95% CI 1.8 12.3, P=0.001) and lymph node metastasis (HR=5.4, 95% CI 2.3 12.7, P<0.001) were independently associated with disease-free survival.

In this setting, one observes that the use of IPTW in an observational study gives slightly lower statistical power than an RCT in the scenario with both a low prevalence of treatment (10%%) and a low effect size (hazard ratio = 1.1).