At each feature set size, a total of fourteen ranked lists were thus obtained.
To achieve a sample of this size, a total of 665 schools will be invited to participate.
Out of this desired sample size a total of 1137 respondents were interviewed mainly due to refusals.
Using this effect size, a total of 2530 patients (1265 per group) would have been needed to see a significant difference between groups.
Despite the small sample size, a total of 25 haplotypes and three single markers were identified including genomic regions not previously reported.
The sample size (a total of 496 – 124 in each factorial group) is calculated to identify a reduction of half in post-antibiotic vulvovaginitis from 23%, while allowing for a 25% drop-out.
To test the difference on anxiety between three groups using a mixed factorial ANOVA, power of 95%, α = 0.05 and a medium effect size a total of 297 subjects was required (99 patients per group) [ 24, 25].
Sample size A total of 49 teeth satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria (Table 2) in 15 patients were selected, requiring normally three restorations per subject, but four patients received some extra restorations because of treatment need.
Due to sample size, a total of two clusters were chosen to represent each area (i.e., healthy habits, peer relationships school performance, social distress, and risky behaviors)–denoting more versus less positive behaviors.
