Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Sample size was based on previous publications19,29,52; power calculations, therefore, were not necessary.
The group size was based on prior experience and literature reports on prior optogenetic-fMRI studies (e.g.,40,41,42).
Sample size was based on a 2-level, half-factorial design.
The sample size was based on previous research [3].
The sample size was based on literature [35, 36].
Optic disc size was based on disc area measurement using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II (Heidelberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany).
The sample size was based on availability of surveyors to obtain information at the hospital.
Sample size was based on the variance of neuronal activity observed in previous experiments.
Determination of sample size was based on a proportionate to size sampling formulae (Groebner and Shannon 2005).
The latter size was based on the scaling between asperity area S a and m (Somerville et al. 2015).
The sample size was based on the safety endpoints.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com