Sentence examples for size ranking from inspiring English sources
The phrase "size ranking" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the order or hierarchy of items based on their size, such as in data analysis, comparisons, or categorization.
Example: "The size ranking of the planets in our solar system shows that Jupiter is the largest, followed by Saturn."
Alternatives: "size order" or "size hierarchy".
The first was its size, ranking with the IMF's assistance to Asian countries in 1997-98.
An article on Thursday about a new era in relations between the United States and Brazil, which recently elected a leftist president, referred imprecisely to that country's size ranking.
Correction: June 10 , 2000 Saturday An article last Saturday about the Pataki administration's final approval for a single-unit power plant to be built in Athens, N.Y., misstated its size ranking.
Correction: July 31 , 2002 Wednesday A report by Bloomberg News in the Technology Briefing column of Business Day on Friday about the second-quarter results for Nextel Partners, which sells a combined mobile-phone and walkie-talkie service in smaller markets, referred incorrectly to its size ranking.
The article also misstated Congo's size ranking in Africa in some copies.
A headline with the advertising column in Business Day yesterday, about the WPP Group's agreement to buy the Grey Global Group, misstated the size ranking of WPP.
The team that ranked 20th in terms of market size ranked sixth in major league attendance.
Of the responsiveness indices used, only effect size ranked the tests differently.
A comparative study of bite force adjusted for body size ranked it as the top felid, alongside the clouded leopard and ahead of the lion and tiger.
This high heritability, combined with high repeatability of body size ranks over ontogeny, indicates the potential for environmental change to elicit an evolutionary response in body size.
North Carolina's size (ranked 11th in the 2000 US Census) and population diversity enabled a thorough evaluation of the completeness of reporting many reportable communicable diseases that have rarely been evaluated in previous studies.
