The size of this effect is bigger than the fund previously thought.
However, the size of this effect varied according to the nature of the policy issue.
The size of this effect varied a lot – it was unreliable in Brazil, the Netherlands, and the Philippines, but more clearly present in the other nine countries.
Anecdotal evidence suggests that workers have gained as corporate taxes have fallen.Oddly, there has been little empirical analysis of the size of this effect.
A study* by Atif Mian and Amir Sufi of the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business pins down the size of this effect, using the credit records of almost 70,000 American borrowers.It could be that an unseen influence, such as greater optimism about future earnings, pushed up both house prices and debt.
The size of this effect depends on the receiver geometry and diverse ambient parameters.
Yet, the size of this effect is found to depend crucially on workers' characteristics (i.e. their age and gender).
The size of this effect depends on many parameters, but it is important to recognize it exists and that accounting for it may be of some utility.
It is also important to note the relative size of this effect and the fact that seeking some or substantial risk have an effect of the same dimension.
Size of this effect is dependent on the magnitude of polarization of nanoparticles, their directions and distances among nanoparticles or aggregates.
The size of this effect complies with our model and the estimated capacitances and can therefore be used as a base for future cell design.
