Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
Although the small sample size of interviews raises valid concerns, the formal interviewees were selected strategically to target specific DRR stakeholders.
Second, the small sample size of interviews conducted in each group at each time point may have limited our ability to detect differences in multivariate analyses.
Similar(58)
Unlike some recent studies we've reported on, this one at least had a reasonable sample size of 74,996 interviews.
Regarding the sample size determination, as a literature review of guidelines suggested that the required sample size of cognitive interviews for translation of HQOL questionnaire is around 5 to 15 [19], we aimed to include more than 16 patients while reflecting differences in cancer type, gender, regional characteristics, and educational background.
Sample size of the interviews was 500 in France, Germany and Switzerland and 541 in Czech Republic.
A sample size of 2,400 interviews is required to reduce the standard error of the global prevalence estimate to 1%.
Sampling proportional to population size (PPS) would, however, have required more complex survey logistics; a fixed sample size of 300 interviews in each community was adopted instead.
Sample size calculations based on past mortality statistics and analyses plans suggested a total sample size of 1200 interviews was required [ 20].
A target sample size of 2850 interviews per month in the surveillance areas was calculated to detect a prevalence of 5%, with a 5% level of precision and a 0.8% allowable error (Epi Info v. 3.0.2, CDC, USA).
A sample size of 20 30 interviews should, therefore, suffice when the aim is to understand perceptions and experiences among a group of stakeholders working on the same common theme.
The sample size of five interviews was determined by the point at which data saturation occurred, that is, the interpretations were consistent and appropriate, and no new critical difficulties emerged [ 28].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com