Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
Complete reactant conversion is attainable in a single-pass operation, so that a recycle loop for the non-converted reactants is superfluous.
The results are represented graphically and compared with the heat transfer efficiency by the adjustment of channel thickness ratio in a single-pass operation (without inserting impermeable sheets).
Heat transfer improvement is considerably obtained by employing such a recyclic double-pass with wire mesh packed, instead of using the flat-plate single-pass operation.
It is shown that there is a range of operating conditions for which very high carbon monoxide conversions (96 99%) are attainable in a single-pass operation due to adsorption of methanol and its continuous withdrawal with solid adsorbent from reaction zone.
Further work with continuous flow and single-pass operation is needed to further improve the efficiency of operation.
Similar(55)
Considerable improvement in heat transfer is obtainable by employing double-pass operations with inserting an impermeable sheet instead of using single-pass operations without external refluxes.
Considerable improvement in mass transfer is obtainable by employing such a double-pass device with external refluxes, instead of using an open conduit with single-pass operations.
The results are represented graphically and compared with those in an open duct (without an impermeable sheet or a permeable barrier inserted and, thus, with single-pass operations).
The theoretical results of heat-transfer efficiency enhancement in double-pass parallel-plate heat exchangers are represented graphically and compared with those in the single-pass operations without an impermeable sheet inserted.
Comparison with the theoretical results shows that the heat-transfer efficiency improvement for double-pass concentric circular heat exchangers is generally higher than those in the single-pass operations without an impermeable barrier inserted.
For a single pass operation, the best HCHO experimental yield is 2.4%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com