Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Similar(60)
Here is a common example: when I say that criminals use Bitcoin for illicit transactions, a common response is 'well, criminals use US currency for illicit transactions as well, so you shouldn't single out Bitcoin.' This line of reasoning is fallacious, because Bitcoin and US currency are too dissimilar to draw such a conclusion.
A similar line of reasoning is used to explain the widely recognized single origin of the plastid.
This line of reasoning seems both unfair and misguided, for a few reasons.
Because of this line of reasoning, managers or technical leads sometimes over-correct and attempt to maximize efficiency by staffing single-person projects to reduce the communication overhead down to zero.
But this line of reasoning is misguided.
He called that line of reasoning "absurd".
He finds this line of reasoning suspicious.
This line of reasoning has three flaws.
This line of reasoning, however, has problems.
This line of reasoning has its limits.
Hi, interesting line of reasoning you have.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com