Since we achieved the best performance for ER-LBD using an ensemble method, it is of particular interest to investigate which chemical characteristics were correctly predicted by different methods and fingerprints (MACCS, ECFP4).
However, since we achieved data saturation, no more in-depth interviews were needed.
We were not limited by inadequate sampling, however, since we achieved a high rate of definitive diagnosis (92.6%), with an average of 2.2 passes.
It is unlikely that we missed an important effect due to inadequate power, since we achieved our target sample size, and since the confidence intervals surrounding the observed difference exclude our a priori meaningful difference.
Since we achieved a higher number of respondents using the cluster sampling method in the 2009 survey compared to the earlier survey, we continued the same cluster sampling method for our subsequent survey in 2011.
12 Insufficient power is an unlikely cause of the lack of replication, since we achieved >98% power to detect an association with an effect size similar to that reported in the prior Japanese study 12 at a 5% significance level.
The high sensitivity of the method was confirmed in our experiments, since we achieved a sensitivity of mutant/wild-type allele detection that ranged between 5% and 7.5% (depending on the mutation type and amplicon), while sequencing analysis had a sensitivity of 12 15%.
Since we never achieve 100% NV− polarization, the described mechanism can also play important role even in (mathrm{B}=0) field (green arrows in Figure 8).
Looking back at the things we achieved since the war, I feel very proud.
