since two weeks ago

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "since two weeks ago" is not correct in standard English usage.
It is typically used to indicate a starting point in the past, but the correct expression would be "for the past two weeks." Example: "I have been feeling unwell for the past two weeks."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

He's done a great job in turning it around.' On his kicking game, he added: 'We talked about it since two weeks ago.

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Bacardi — untameable since 1862".

The New York Times

Uzbekistan Independent since December 1991.

Independent

Few have since 1966.

The New York Times

chief since 2011.

The New York Times

"Those living since 1932".

The New York Times

Guaranteed since 1947".

The New York Times

KAZAN: Since 1945.

The New Yorker

Reliable Since 1922".

The New Yorker

Essential listening since 1995.

Independent

PoetryAustralian Poetry Since 1788.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to a period of time that extends to the present, use "for the past two weeks" or "in the last two weeks" to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "since" to describe a duration. "Since" indicates a starting point, not a length of time. Instead of saying "since two weeks ago", use "for the past two weeks" to clearly express the duration.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "since two weeks ago" functions as an adverbial phrase attempting to specify a timeframe. However, it's grammatically flawed because "since" introduces a starting point, not a duration. Ludwig AI confirms its incorrect usage, suggesting alternatives for expressing duration.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "since two weeks ago" attempts to define a duration, it is grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI points out, "since" indicates a starting point, not a duration. To accurately convey a timeframe of two weeks leading up to the present, it's best to use phrases such as "for the past two weeks" or "in the last two weeks". These alternatives ensure clarity and grammatical correctness. The single example provided by Ludwig comes from News & Media which is an outlier given the grammatical incorrectness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for the past two weeks

This is the grammatically correct and most common way to indicate a duration of two weeks leading up to the present.

in the last two weeks

Similar to 'for the past two weeks', this phrase specifies a period ending in the present, but with slightly less emphasis on continuity.

over the last two weeks

This alternative is nearly identical in meaning to 'in the last two weeks', providing a natural and grammatically sound option.

during the last couple of weeks

This phrase is more conversational and less formal, using 'couple' to approximate the two-week duration.

within the last fourteen days

This is a more precise and formal way to specify the timeframe, using the exact number of days.

these past two weeks

Emphasizes the period that has just passed, similar in meaning but with a different word order.

the previous two weeks

This refers to the two weeks immediately before a specific point in time, which may or may not be the present.

a fortnight ago

This uses the term 'fortnight', which means two weeks, to specify a point two weeks in the past.

two weeks prior

This places the timeframe relative to another event, indicating the two weeks leading up to that event.

since a couple of weeks back

This alternative uses more colloquial language and expresses a duration of roughly two weeks, but it's less precise.

FAQs

What is the correct way to refer to a period of two weeks leading up to now?

The correct ways to refer to a period of two weeks leading up to the present are phrases like "for the past two weeks", "in the last two weeks", or "over the last two weeks".

Is "since two weeks ago" grammatically correct?

No, "since two weeks ago" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The word "since" is used to indicate a starting point, not a duration of time. It's better to use phrases like "for the past two weeks".

What's the difference between "since two weeks ago" and "for the past two weeks"?

"Since two weeks ago" is not standard English. "For the past two weeks" is grammatically correct and indicates a duration of two weeks leading up to the present moment.

Can I use "since" to indicate a duration of time?

No, "since" is used to indicate a starting point in time. To indicate a duration, use phrases like "for the last two weeks" or "over the past two weeks".