Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
However, since this prediction matrix is based on NFI binding specificity in vitro, the specificity of this family of proteins may be different from that observed in the cell, where interactions with other transcription factors may take place and DNA accessibility may be restrained by chromatin.
Similar(59)
The years since have borne out this prediction.
Our data is quite consistent with this prediction, since out of 179 species that were molecularly characterized, only four had two chains longer than 18 carbons (i.e. C20∶3/C20∶3 PA, C20∶4/C20∶3 PA, C20∶3/C20∶3 PI, and C20∶3/C20∶4 PI), and in these cases the chains were only 20 carbons long and all contained 3 or more double bonds.
Studies in living adult rat myocytes [Ca2+]m confirmed this prediction, since [Ca2+]m remained less than [Ca2+]c until the latter rose above 500 nM [18].
However, our observations are in contrast with this prediction, since the annual C. impatiens had lower substitution rate than the perennial C. resedifolia.
Our data are consistent with this prediction, since in the absence of FasL in BALB/c FasL−/− mice we observed a significant increase in the infiltration of CD11b-positive cells into the subretinal space following retinal detachment, even in the presence of reduced expression of the chemotactic factor MCP-1.
This prediction has since been tested and validated with experimental infections in mice (de Roode et al., 2005).
However, this prediction is limited since it refers to mechanisms that have already been explained.
However, this prediction was not observed since we did see reliable changes in the monkeys' choices (Fig. 4).
The methodology is illustrated in Figure 2. The most probable local regression model was chosen for prediction, since this gave higher prediction accuracy than using a weighted sum of the local models.
Syntenic fragment plots provide a test of this model, since the prediction is that there will be no coverage in the column above genes that are randomly inserted into the query genome.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com