Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(6)
Since this conclusion follows from the PC, it is a conclusion about the necessary constitution of the simple beings of our universe.
But since this conclusion is silent as to how such awareness occurs, it does not rule out the possibility that it is achieved through inner sense.
In assessing Boyle's experiments designed to prove that all tangible properties depend on the mechanical features of objects, Spinoza wonders why Boyle bothered, since this conclusion "has already been abundantly proved by Verulam, and later Descartes".
Since this conclusion is true for any weakly-∗ convergent subsequence of { u k } k ∈ N, it follows that u is the weak-∗ limit for the whole sequence { u k } k ∈ N. □.
It follows from Theorem 5 that sigma(mathcal{A})subseteqPhi^{p}(mathcal{A}), but since this conclusion holds for any (pin[1,infty]), we immediately have the following theorem.
Since this conclusion was based on indirect measurements of NO by the Griess reaction, the role of NO signaling during CA in the yeast remains uncertain.
Similar(54)
The government of India has since accepted this conclusion.
Since premises of this conclusion must feature no language not in this conclusion, and they have no greater complexity (in these systems), there are only a finite number of possible premises.
History may well draw this conclusion, since Cameron's six years in office produced two governments that were both strongly committed to austerity measures.
We note that Theorem 1 of [2] cannot guarantee this conclusion since (f(frac{1}{2},s)=0), (forall sin[0,1)).
Since (the objection continues), this conclusion is absurd, Stevenson's theory of moral thought must be false.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com