Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(8)
Regarding the computational time parameters, a time step of 1 s was selected and the simulations had a total time elapsed of 500 s.
In this case, we used an ANOVA, since the response, obtained from simulations, had a certain degree of bias, as it came from optimization results (Equations 1, 2 and 3) that are sensitive to initial conditions.
In terms of the computational time parameters, as used in the Barcelonnette study case, a calculation time step of 1 s was selected and the simulations had a total time elapsed of 500 s.
The simulations had a good agreement with experiments and values of 0.75 for coefficient of friction, 2 5 N/mm2 for debond stress, 1 4 N/mm2 for clamping stress and 3 6 N/m for fracture energy release rate were obtained as interfacial parameters for the composite.
Simulations had a time step of one week.
These simulations had a sample size of 100.
Eighteen percent of our simulations had a peak LOD score over 3.5, thus the evidence for linkage to this locus is still not genome-wide 'significant' [ 27].
Similar(4)
In multiway sensitivity analyses, 94% of simulations had an ICER below $50,000/QALY.
The covariance C 3 that was used in the simulations had an easy to interpret interaction parameter γ ∈ 0[ 1].
Nearly every parameter we evaluated in our simulations had an impact on the accuracy of read trees in at least some settings.
Indeed, large microcircuits under our simplified simulations had an abnormally large spontaneous rate, which would therefore be better restrained by recurrent inhibition.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com