Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(34)
Simulation results reported in the figure were based on 25000 simulated trials for each of the 52 combinations of stimulus and reward conditions.
Thus, in order to compare all agents we calculated the NCB for each one of the 1000 simulations and subsequently we calculated for each agent the proportion of the simulated trials in which each agent had the highest NCB across a range of RBAT values.
For all three procedures, d' was set to 1.4, the overall decision criterion was set to 1.7, and 100,000 simulated trials were run.
To extend and generalize his analyses, we varied the criterion locations continuously for 10,000 different simulated trials of each type, thus mapping out the full theoretical ROC.
Through NextGen-DF, we present massive and user-generated comparison results based on over 4 million simulated trials, which clearly indicate the inferiority of 3 + 3.
For each delay and stimulus condition, we ran
Similar(26)
We illustrate this study design through a simulated trial example, and we investigate the operating characteristics using simulation studies.
To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, it is applied to a simulated trial stranding scenario.
The model exhibits theta band oscillation, especially among the non-5-HT inhibitory neurons during the rewarding outcome of a simulated trial, thus forming a model prediction.
The sample size for each simulated trial was 50,000.
Group sizes were equal in each simulated trial.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com