Further simplification of the problem yields a form that can be solved analytically.
The simplification of the problem into 3D bare frames would lead to uneconomic design.
Existing solutions are often dimensional based on simplification of the problem such as assuming adiabatic conditions.
This is an over simplification of the problem that might limit its applicability in real life scenarios.
Under very general conditions, one thermal simulation and two mechanical simulations suffice to estimate the whole deformation of a beam, resulting in a great simplification of the problem.
This strategy resulted in a great simplification of the problem, allowing all the considered experimental results to fall within a narrow scatter band.
The further introduction of the hypotheses of linear behavior of the viscous-elastic strain distribution and of external loads concentrated at the end of each time step, leads to a significant simplification of the problem presented above.
It is shown that use of infinite series counterparts of conventional Levy-type closed-form expressions result in a tremendous simplification of the problem without any compromise on accuracy.
The reduction of the simulation frequency is proposed as a simplification of the problem which is required for computational reasons.
