A very simple formulation is presented, to enable section sizes to be determined to satisfy this criterion.
In this paper, a simple formulation is presented based on the acoustic analogy that is valid for both subsonic and supersonic quadrupole noise prediction.
A comparison of the present results with those in the published literature indicates that the present relatively simple formulation is as efficient as the other well established techniques.
The long-term behaviour of the model under a relatively simple formulation is shown in Figure4.
This apparently simple formulation is in fact susceptible of three quite different interpretations, each of which brings with it its own problems.
This simple formulation is enough to reveal a connection between imperfect conditional cooperation and the presence of decay, one of the main ingredients in some influential models of network formation (e.g., Jackson and Wolinsky 1996, or Bala and Goyal 2000).2 In these models, the decay represents frictions that determine the value of the externalities generated by individual links.
The consequence of our simple formulation is (1) that each spike in the SC contributes a fixed, tiny movement vector to the saccade, and (2) that movement fields of SC cells are dynamic.
This paper examines the modelling of gyroplane flight mechanics in the context of this complexity, and shows that relatively simple formulations are adequate for capturing most aspects of gyroplane trim, stability and control characteristics.
One of the simplest formulations is as follows: left{ begin{array}{rcl} frac{dmathbf{x}}{dt} &=& f(mathbf{x}, mathbf{u}), mathbf{y} &=& g(mathbf{x}, mathbf{u}), end{array} right.
The analytical model, originally developed for walls and based on a simple physical formulation, is adapted.
