Sentence examples for significantly smaller surface from inspiring English sources

On the other hand, for the 750°C sample, a significantly smaller surface area and, in turn, a lower photocatalytic activity were observed.

This can be attributed to the volume expansion of the material due to HWA-induced oxidation and some pore coalescence resulting in significantly smaller surface area and pore volume.

However, we found that European lakes had significantly smaller surface area:catchment ratios and higher mean catchment slopes (t-tests, α<0.05; Figure 3).

A significantly smaller surface area was observed in case of duplication (mean aHG decrease of 22%% in case of duplication, Table  2).

Follicular melanoma has been reported as a rare variant of melanoma, to be distinguished from lentigo maligna melanoma by its significantly smaller surface area (typically < 0.5 cm), the relative symmetry of the lesion and its similarity in appearance to a comedo or pigmented cyst.

Coagulation of cellulose with aqueous ethanol was confirmed to afford materials of significantly smaller pore surface area compared to that obtained with pure ethanol (Fig.  12a, b).

A similar result was observed on the right side [ F(1 226) = 16, p < 10−3], with significantly smaller aHG surface area in cases of right duplication (mean decrease of 11%% in case of duplication).

Moreover, Hes1−/− mouse embryos showed a significantly smaller total thyroid surface area (−40 to −60%) compared to wild type mice at all study time points (E9.5−E16.5).

In summary, both participant populations shifted toward a significantly greater proportion of deep feature card pairings, but only non biology majors showed a significantly smaller proportion of surface feature card pairs and a significantly greater proportion of unexpected pairs in the framed task condition compared with the unframed task condition.

In the framed task condition, non biology majors constructed a significantly smaller proportion of surface feature pairs (16.2 ± 0.8% vs. 40.8 ± 2.9%; p < 0.0001) and a significantly greater proportion of deep feature (39.6 ± 2.0% vs. 29.2 ± 2.2%; p = 0.0006) and unexpected pairs (44.2 ± 1.5% vs. 30.0 ± 1.6%; p < 0.0001) compared with their initial results in the unframed task condition.

By comparison primary human B-cells exhibited lower CD19 and CD21 FACS shifts than expected from their immunofluorescence intensity (Fig 2A,B), most likely due to their significantly (approximately 3×) smaller surface area for antibody binding than cultured B-cell lines (compare cell sizes in Fig 1G,F).