Sentence examples for significantly smaller response from inspiring English sources

Thus, after LPS treatment, carotid arteries from MPO−/− animals showed a significantly smaller response to Ach than arteries from controls, P < 0.01).

A similar, but significantly smaller, response is noticed with a medium from nonirradiated cultures, but only in the stationary growth phase with almost 100 times more cells involved.

At 12°C the peak Ca2+ transient had a mean amplitude of 1.0 ± 0.15 fluorescent ratio units (n = 38), at 21°C the same concentration of poly-APS evoked a significantly smaller response of 0.43 ± 0.06 fluorescent ratio units (n = 56; P < 0.001; Figure 4A,B).

After 5 minutes of 100% oxygen, diabetic subjects without retinopathy showed slightly weaker control of blood flow compared to normal participants (53% reduction and 61% reduction, resp .. Subjects with both nonproliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy had a significantly smaller response (38% reduction and 24% reduction, resp).

In addition, significantly smaller responses were found for the visual-exposure condition as compared with the no-training condition (t 9) = 3.00, p<.05).

The knockout mice showed significantly smaller responses to glutamate than wild-type mice.

The LPS-primed shams developed marked tolerance: When challenged with a lethal dose of LPS, they exhibited a significantly smaller thermal response (magnitude 0.5±0.2°C) and none died.

When tested 14 days after the drug treatment, RU-486-injected mice showed significantly smaller freezing responses during tone presentation than mock-injected mice (mock-injected mice, 37.6±3.9%; RU-486-injected mice, 11.5±2.6%; F1,13 = 41.9, P<0.001) (Fig. 7E).

These responses were significantly smaller than the responses in flies fed retinal.

Evoked responses at the E1 location were significantly elevated compared to zero response, although they were significantly smaller than the responses at the E2 location.

The t-test split the genes into two groups, p38-independent (genes for which differences in expression levels in the presence and absence of SB203580 were not significant; Fig. 5B) and p38-dependent (genes showing a significantly smaller UV-induced response in samples treated in the presence than absence of SB203580 Fig. 5C and Table S4).