Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
Although the S100B levels in these subjects were reduced after 4 weeks, the difference was not significantly significant (p = 0.28).
However, at lower concentrations 1.25-2.5 μg/mL, the inhibition was not significantly significant (p > 0.05) compared to the control and hence the IC50 value was not calculated.
ESTs from the PmaxArray 1.0 identified as significantly significant (P < 0.001) and representing a cluster of interest, were single pass sequenced from their corresponding clones as detailed previously.
Both values had no significant variation at each time point after the experiment in Group A. Both values began to increase 2 h after the experiment in Group B and maintained a gradual increasing trend with significant difference compared with Group A. Compared with Group B, both values significantly decreased in Group C. The difference was significantly significant (P < 0.05) (Table 4).
The median duration of clinical signs prior to diagnosis of idiopathic IMHA was 3 days (range 0-141 days) in the P protocol group and 6 (range 0-131 days) in the AP protocol group; this difference was significantly significant (P = 0.015).
Similar(55)
The correlations were considered significantly significant at p < 0,05.
Biologic markers of oxidative stress (malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide generation) increased significantly with concomitant significant (P < 0.05) decrease in serum glutathione level in a dose-dependent manner when compared with control.
Fo was not significantly affected by treatments, but significant (P ≤ 0.05) differences in Fm and Fv were observed (Figure 4).
We also showed significantly (p < 0.05) and highly significant (p < 0.001) decreased expression of MAGI3 and ZFP37 (respectively) in the most malignant tumors (Table 3).
In contrast, the model estimated an average decrease of 31%% (CI −6 to −49 %) in node volume that was significant (p = 0.020) and significantly different to primary tumours (p = 0.060).
Although parasite burden varies significantly between experiments (P<0.0001) this interaction is not significant (P = 0.3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com