More modern C++ is significantly more safe than it used to be, but there are fundamental aspects of C++ which make it impossible to ever be truly safe.
Additional analysis revealed that the female participants made significantly more safe responses (choosing +20 points) immediately after receiving punishment feedback than did the male participants (Z = 1.946, P = 0.050).
In several therapeutic areas this concept has proved to be therapeutically valuable; for example, the monitoring of blood concentrations of aminoglycosides or immunosuppressive drugs has resulted in the therapy with these drugs becoming significantly more safe and efficient.
It's significantly more secure.
In his later and less-active years, an agreement was made to keep the Yankees in the Bronx, and we now have a wonderful new Yankee Stadium in a wonderful neighborhood that is not significantly more or less safe at game time than it was when Steinbrenner was the world's highest-profile Bronx basher.
Results showed that, despite the short duration of the intervention, participants self-reported significantly more use of safe sex behaviors and being prepared for sexual intimacy after the intervention.
And many studies suggest that the combination of medication and talk therapy is significantly more effective, and safer, than either alone.
Indeed, test flies took significantly longer before staying within the safe zone for 20 s and covered significantly more distance outside the safe zone than control flies (Figure 4).
Regardless of study group, if the home was safe (i.e., had working alarms on all levels) at the end of the original home visit, it was significantly more likely to be safe at follow up (OR =17.06, p < 0.01) compared to homes that were unsafe at the end of the home visit.
40 Concerning endocrine therapy, a meta-analysis 41 showed that aromatase inhibitors are significantly more effective and as safe as tamoxifen, and reported a clinical objective response rate (relative risk 1.29), ultrasound objective response rate (relative risk 1.29), and BCS rate (relative risk 1.36).
> In both hunger states, the fox spent significantly more time foraging in the safe patch than in the risky patch (paired t test, hungry: t15 = −3.171, p = 0.006; very hungry: t13 = −3.039, p = 0.01) and ate significantly more food in the safe patch (paired t test, hungry: t15 = −3.418, p = 0.004; very hungry: t13 = −5.194, p < 0.001).
