Sentence examples for significantly lower range from inspiring English sources

Furthermore, the CKS design showed a significantly lower range of tibial rotation (p < 0.05) from maximum extension to maximum flexion during deep knee bend activities.

The heat of combustion for methanol, at 22.3 MJ/kg, is substantially less than gasoline, typically 44 MJ/kg, so a vehicle burning methanol would have a significantly lower range compared to gasoline.

Interestingly, this last value for MFR in patients was slightly but not significantly lower than that in control subjects, due to a significantly lower range of MFR in patients than in control subjects.

In DON-treated samples, DON-3-sulfate was detected in the range of 0.29 1.4 mg/kg fresh weight while DON-15-sulfate concentrations were significantly lower (range 0.015 0.061 mg/kg fresh weight).

Results: Among girls (n = 117), birth weight was significantly lower (range, 84 195 g) in association with a 1-SD increase in ln-transformed maternal serum concentrations of DDT, PBDE congeners 28 and 183, and paternal serum concentrations of PBDE-183 and PCB-167.

In the groups without GERD, the percentages of cerebral palsy patients were significantly lower, ranging from 2%to41%1%.

In contrast, the mean WTP for a QALY value in terms of prevention (WTP/QALYprevention) was significantly lower, ranging from 26,000 to 137,000 baht.

The first sample taken during the rehabilitation process showed significantly lower ranges than those observed in all other groups (p < 0.05), while the last sample showed values similar to those observed in animals in human care and in the wild.

Therefore, we validated our results using larger groups of single embryos from homozygous wild-type or mutant parents, also demonstrating that the induction levels of innate immune-response genes were in significantly lower ranges in mutant than in wild-type embryos (Figs 5, 7).

Patients receiving etanercept had a significantly lower rate of dose escalation (range 0.4 2.9%) than those receiving adalimumab (range 7.0 28.3%) according to all five methods of calculating dose escalation for both new and continuing patients (P < 0.001) (Table  3).

For small lesions (n = 16, < 35 ml), however, (local) rigid PET registration and all CT registrations showed a significantly lower DSC (range: 0.44 to 0.65) compared to non-rigid PET and CTPET registration (0.79).