Sentence examples for significantly lower error from inspiring English sources

In this paper, we show that by searching among degree distributions designed for UEP with worse threshold than the corresponding non-UEP degree distributions, we may find degree distributions with significantly lower error rates for a finite length than the degree distributions with the best possible threshold.

Additionally, the GS FLX system has a significantly lower error profile than the GS 20 system.

We test our method on three publicly available gene expression datasets and achieve significantly lower error rate for a substantial identifiable subset of patients.

A significantly lower error rate occurred among participants with previous scientific writing experience, but reported satisfaction was unaffected by writing experience.

Newcomer et al. (2000) [ 28] reported significantly larger repositioning error in patients with LBP in trunk flexion and significantly lower error in trunk extension when compared to a control group.

Blegen et al. [ 15] analyzed factors that increase adverse events in hospitalized patients and found that, compared to patients treated in hospitals with few experienced nurses, patients treated in hospitals with numerous experienced nurses have significantly lower error rates, readmission rates, infection rates, and mortality rates and experience significantly fewer falls and pressure sores.

Whereas the basic algorithm already shows significantly lower errors than performing no correction, the advanced algorithm yields even further improvement.

The RMSE measurement revealed that the proposed hybrid Kalman filter produced significantly lower errors than the standard Kalman filter or the linear filter (paired t-test, P < 0.01) for both position and speed.

In one case, the paper and pencil mode of data collection produced a 6.7% error frequency, compared with a significantly lower 2.8% error frequency obtained by patients using the microcomputer technology [ 35].

Results from this evaluation showed significantly lower absolute error (13.3 ± 13 g vs. 28.3 ± 38.5 g) and relative absolute error (28 ± 20.5% vs. 56.1��± 75.6%) with the GoCARB system than with the patients' estimation.

A Tukey post-hoc test for hip abduction revealed that digital photographic (4.8° ±3.8) measurement had a significantly lower measurement error than visual estimation (6.2° ±4.1, p = 0.015).