Exact(1)
If I absolutely had to choose, I'd go with the W200 simply because the end product is better — none of these cameras produces good images, but the Playsport was significantly less sharp in images and video.
Similar(56)
At year 2, patients receiving combination therapy continued to have significantly less radiographic progression (mean change 1.9 Sharp units) compared with those treated with either adalimumab (5.5 units) or MTX (10.4 units) monotherapy (P <0.001 for both comparisons).
After 2 years of treatment, patients receiving combination therapy continued to have significantly less radiographic progression (mean change, 1.9 Sharp units) compared with those receiving either adalimumab monotherapy (5.5 units) or MTX monotherapy (10.4 units) (P <0.001 for both comparisons).
In the SUMURAI study, the TCZ group showed statistically significantly less radiographic change in the van der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Score (TSS) than the DMARD group at week 52 [ 69].
After 52 weeks, the tocilizumab group showed significantly less radiographic change in the van der Heijde score (modified Sharp score) (mean 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 3.2; p <0.01) compared to the DMARD group (mean 6.1, 95% CI: 4.2 8.0; p <0.01).
Fewer applications, not to mention a sharp reduction in customized code, fewer servers and significantly less data inside many data centers means it's now much easier to spot aberrations in traffic flows.
At week 52 there was statistically significantly less radiographic progression (Fig. 2), as measured by change in total Sharp score, in the patients receiving adalimumab either 40 mg every other week (change [mean ± standard deviation] 0.1 ± 4.8) or 20 mg weekly (0.8 ± 4.9), as compared with that in the placebo group (2.7 ± 6.8; P < 0.001).
The change in total Sharp score was significantly lower in the combination group, indicating significantly less radiological progression.
"Less sharp and jagged".
Yes, significantly less.
Women still earn significantly less than men.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com