Sentence examples for significantly less sensitivity from inspiring English sources

When compared to the forward photoemission techniques, measurements of the unoccupied states suffer from significantly less sensitivity and lower resolution.

All of the NMR relaxation measurements on solid samples showed significantly less sensitivity to thermal aging than the T2,H relaxation times of solvent-swollen samples.

On the other hand, down-regulation of LeMYC2 in RNAi lines led to significantly less sensitivity to ABA with higher rate of seed germination.

In the NADH-based assay, pyruvate production was measured through lactate dehydrogenase, but with significantly less sensitivity, so the product concentrations were much higher.

Moreover, Kiyozuka et al. reported that the ovarian cancer cells with longer TRF and higher steady-state hTR expression showed significantly less sensitivity to CDDP [ 9].

Computer-aided detection (average of 19 radiologists) was slightly and not significantly less sensitive (sensitivity: 42.1 vs 46.1%, χ=3.24, df=1, P=0.07) but more specific (recall rate 23.9 vs 26.1%, χ=3.8, df=1, P=0.04) as compared to DOUBLE (average of 171 readings).

And if the OxyPrem is significantly less sensitive to changes in oxygenation on the lower arm it is likely that this translates into less sensitivity to changes in the brain.

In contrast, MCF-7 cells overexpressing class III β-tubulin were significantly less sensitive to paclitaxel, and the knockdown of class III β-tubulin significantly increased their sensitivity to paclitaxel (P<0.01; Table 1).

CDTs (P < 0.02) were significantly lower (less sensitivity) and HPTs (P < 0.001) were significantly higher (less sensitivity) at the tongue and lip in BMS patients compared to control participants.

However, such high compressive stress concentrations are also known to produce significantly less imperfection sensitivity than uniform compression.

At the tongue and lip, the CDTs in the BMS patients were significantly lower (less sensitivity) than in the healthy subjects (P = 0.02), there were no significant differences between the two groups at the hand and V3 sites (Table 3).