Sentence examples for significantly less efficacious from inspiring English sources

Specifically, rinsing with water alone was significantly less efficacious, and a combination of cationic detergent solution and ultrasonication was significantly more efficacious than the other methods (p < 0.05).

Three hours after antisepsis, the bacterial reduction on the gloved hand was only significantly less efficacious than that of the reference when 75% ethanol was used.

However, as shown in Table 3 and Fig. 2, only the first and ninth cleaning strategies (rinsing with water and immersion in water and cationic detergent in an ultrasonic bath, respectively) were significantly different from the others, the former being significantly less efficacious, and the latter being significantly more efficacious.

Whereas the mean immediate bacterial reductions caused by ethanol at concentrations of 75% (log RF 1.68) and 95% (log RF 2.70) were significantly less efficacious compared to that of the reference (log RF 3.27), at 85% they were not significantly less active with both applications, 3 and 5 min (log RFs 2.90 and 3.12, respectively).

NPDox also showed tumor growth inhibition, however, it was significantly less efficacious than NPDox/VLA4−pep.

Piperine was significantly less efficacious on α5β2 receptors (IGABA,max = 136 ± 22%, n = 6, Fig. 2A, Tables 1 and 2).

However, the need to vaccinate yearly is one contributing factor to poor uptake rates and, even if vaccinated, it is possible to fall ill; the vaccine is only about 70% efficacious in young healthy adults [1] and on occasion the chosen vaccine strain does not match the emerging virus making it significantly less effective [2].

In another rat study relaxant responses to isoprenaline were significantly less potent and less efficacious against carbachol than against passive tension, KCL, bradykinin or serotonin [ 44].

In this model, the triple combination, containing primaquine (0.25 mg/kg), was marginally but significantly (P = 0.0014) less efficacious than A-L alone (inhibition in oocyst intensity of 71%[955% CI of 43 to 86] compared to 94%[955% CI of 88 to 97], mean oocyst intensity = 16.6 [SEM = 3.2], oocyst prevalence = 69.5%).

Low doses of either agent were less efficacious and did not significantly increase apoptotic cells (Table 2).

This first clinical trial carried out in South America on DHA-PPQ showed that this new fixed-dose ACT is as efficacious as MAS3 but better tolerated and with significantly less adverse events.