Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
After correcting for significant variables between the two treatment groups, we found no statistically significant difference in outcome based on preparative regimen.
Significant variables between the hypovolemic and euvolemic patients were the mean arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, CVP, and IJV collapsibility index (Table 2).
The variables were significant variables between the two groups.
To adjust for age differences, logistic regression was applied to test the differences of the significant variables between the groups.
Statistically significant variables between the survivors and the nonsurvivors included arterial lactate level (2.3 ± 1.5 vs. 5.0 ± 5.2mmol/l, P = 0.034), PI (2.2 ± 1.7 vs. 0.87 ± 1.1, P = 0.013).
In addition, statistically significant variables between the survivors and the non-survivors included ScvO2, PI and lactate at T8 after early resuscitation.
After case-control matching, the significant variables between the non-high-dose and high-dose PPI groups for a Rockall score ≥ 6 were the rebleeding rate, and the amount of blood transfused.
A statistically-significant variable between shunt responders and non-responders was CSF pressure.
Two-way interactions were studied between significant variables in all multivariate analyses.
Reduced models taking into account significant variables and interactions between variables have shown good correlations with the experimental results.
All first-order interactions between significant variables were tested but none were significant.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com