Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Skewness and GLNU were significant using WT method.
Differences in retention were not significant using survival analysis.
Still, it was found to be statistically significant using the Student t test.
These results are statistically significant using a paired t test, where p < 0.01 in all instances.
This finding was statistically significant using a 2-tailed Fishers exact test (p = 0.0289).
This difference was not shown to be statistically significant using the Bristol scoring system.
As Table 2 shows, all group differences were significant using this conservative criterion.
These findings were found to be significant using a Cochran's test for related observations.
Except pH, the rest examined factors were identified as significant, using ANOVA analysis.
Furthermore, the over-representation of CRISPRs within GIs was statistically significant using chi-squared analysis.
Results were significant using statistical analysis as described in the Methods section.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com