Sentence examples for significant salience from inspiring English sources

But they indicate that the concept of a hole is of significant salience in the common-sense picture of the world, specifically of the spatiotemporal world.

Further analyses including all groups showed that only the groups 1, 3, 5, and 6 showed significant salience effect (group 3 has the smallest mean difference of 202.5 ms with a standard error of 54.72) and that the groups 2, 4, and 7 did not.

This effect can be observed in Figure 2, which shows the significant main effect of salience and the significant interaction between the salience effect and the group effect.

Moreover, a significant effect of stimuli salience on prefrontal NE outflow was evident between IL, IL+FR and IPL.

No significant overall differences in salience, seriousness or believability of health warnings were found between the pack types, but participants reported looking more closely at the warnings on plain packs and also thinking more about what the warnings were telling them (p<0.001).

For these analyses, we only retained the one latent variable set (ui vi) that had significant brain and task saliences after FDR = 0.05 correction.

The standard error estimates of the voxel weights/saliences in each singular image from the bootstrap tests are used to assess the reliability of the nonzero saliences in significant LVs.

New York regained stature and salience after a significant redesign of the magazine and Web site over the past few years.

Time Inc. may be baked into the name of Time Warner, but it long ago lost salience as a significant player in the company's business.

In Excerpt (5), the impact of events on the US and Russia are shown as significant in terms of their Salience in the historical landscape (major, dominant), their Depth of impact (dramatic, transformed, profound), their Quantity (massive) and their Distribution across space (a larger shift).

There was also a marginally significant main effect of relative salience, F 1,12) = 3.54, p = 0.08, ηp2 = 0.23, indicating that participants were faster to respond when the target was more salient than the decoy.