Sentence examples for significant representation for from inspiring English sources

The commissioners said the draft called for a directly elected president, supported by a vice president and a prime minister, a strong central government rather than a provincial federation, a two-chamber parliament with significant representation for women and an independent judiciary.

And for the first time, the new opposition negotiating body includes significant representation for rebel brigades, including Damascus-area powerhouse Jeish al-Islam.

Serotonergic and adrenergic dysfunction has been implicated in suicide [5], [70], yet we did not detect a significant representation of genes coding for components of these neurotransmitter systems in our differential expression analyses.

In terms of Biological Processes significant representation (p<0.05) was found for cell proliferation and differentiation, apoptosis and intracellular signalling (Table 2).

Iris recognition systems are still incapable for providing low false rejection and significant representation.

Despite significant representation in the Stem fields, religion can serve as a spectre.

Under a PR system, targeting the graduate vote can generate significant representation in parliament.

But with populist and protectionist forces gaining significant representation in the new Australian parliament, the Coalition will struggle to achieve broad-based political support for its trade liberalisation agenda, which is a key element of its economic policy approach.

An ANOVA for representations and lengths showed a significant length effect (F 1, 24) = 10.80, p<0.01), a significant representation effect (F 2, 48) = 3.82, p<0.05), and a non-significant interaction.

A two-way ANOVA for the three representations and two column lengths showed a significant interaction (F 2, 44) = 9.56, p<0.001), a significant length effect (F 1, 22) = 18.10, p<0.001), and a significant representation effect (F 2, 44) = 62.66, p<0.001).

The error rates for E-E, E-I, and I-I were 0.52%, 5.2%, and 5.7% for length 2, and 3.1%, 8.9%, and 4.2% for length 3. A two-way ANOVA for the three representations and two column lengths showed a non-significant interaction, a non-significant length effect, but a significant representation effect (F 2, 44) = 6.08, p<0.01).