Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
However, behavioral data did not reveal significant reaction time differences among expressions.
We found a significant reaction time difference in assigning direction for rightward (693.8 ms) vs. leftward (746.1 ms) photographs, t 5,1) = 4.12, p<0.01.
In contrast to the control group they showed no significant reaction time increase between blocks 6 (random) and 7 (sequence) and this is indicative of implicit learning deficits.
We also did not observe significant reaction time differences between the 2-back/4 and 2-back/1 blocks that would suggest differences in overall task attention or motivation.
Similar(56)
The difference between the spelling and control tasks was not significant for accuracy (t 54) = 0.232, P = 0.817), but significant for reaction time with the spelling task slower than the control task (t 54) = 7.274, P < 0.001).
The interaction between group and condition was not significant on the spelling task for accuracy (F6,156 = 1.974, P = 0.073), but was significant for reaction time (F6,156 = 2.663, P = 0.017).
For longer ISIs, the validity effect was no longer significant, although reaction time for both trial types decreased with increasing ISI (repeated measures ANOVA, main effect of factor ISI, F 2,36) = 72.87, p = 0.000001) suggesting an increase of alertness when the ISI is longer.
This difference was significant for reaction time (RT, t = −1.84, p < 0.05), when the order of drug and placebo was taken into account, as well as for inverse efficiency (combining RT and accuracy into a single value [ 28], t = −2.52, p < 0.05), and for the latter this was significant also without taking the order-effect into account (t = −1.97, p < 0.05).
Although significant response time deficits (both reaction time and movement time) have been identified in numerous studies of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), few attempts have been made to evaluate the use of these measures in screening for PD.
Particles with 5 to 7 nm in diameter required significant longer reaction times than the particles with 2 to 3 nm in diameter and still showed worse functionalization efficiencies [12].
It was found that mold-exposed subjects show statistically significant decreases in attention span and significant increases in reaction time to stimuli compared to controls.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com