Sentence examples for significant positive interference from inspiring English sources

Moreover, in some pairs of intervals, significant positive interference was replaced by significant negative interference, e.g. in the h- cu-sr region, with ĉ = 0.41 in control and ĉ = 1.32 in selection lines (P = 5.1 × 10 7).

Thus, significant positive interference in the region y-cv-v of chromosome X in the control was replaced by no interference in the selection lines: the coefficient of coincidence c increased from 0.56 to 0.95 (P = 8.4 × 10 3).

Moreover, in the cv-v-f region, significant positive interference in the control (ĉ = 0.70) changed to significant negative interference (ĉ = 1.40) in the selection lines; the difference between the two estimates was highly significant (P = 1.1 × 10 16).

To calculate interference strength we compared cM values in each interval from tetrads that had a crossover in the adjacent interval, to the same intervals in tetrads lacking a crossover in the adjacent interval, and detected significant positive interference in all cases (Table 9) (Berchowitz and Copenhaver, 2008).

Although no increase in rf in the lines selected for hypoxia tolerance was detected in the 3 L arm, we observed significant changes in interference in this arm: either considerable relaxation of strong positive interference (e.g. in h- th- sr region) or replacement of significant positive interference with no interference (e.g. in ru- h- th region).

We did not find negative interference in chromosome 2, but the tendency towards significant relaxation of positive interference in the selection lines was expressed in both arms, e.g. in region net-dp-b in 2 L (from 0.35 to 0.81, P = 2.3 × 10 5) and in cn-kn-px in 2R (from 0.38 to 0.91, P = 1.3 × 10 6).

A significant relaxation of positive interference was observed for several pairs of these intervals: for ru-h_ cu-sr, coefficient ĉ changed from 0.52 to 1.14 (P = 2.3 × 10 3), for ru-h_cu-e from 0.41 to 0.92 (P = 4.0 × 10 4), and for ru-th_cu-sr from 0.36 to 0.73 (P = 5.8 × 10 3; Additional file 1: Table S3 and Additional file 5).

As in chromosomes X and 2, selection caused a consistent and, in certain cases, highly significant tendency toward relaxation of positive interference in adjacent and non-adjacent intervals in chromosome 3.

Coincidence of interval-pair cases of changes in interference with significant positive correlation between rf values in the interval-pairs (a) and with significant increases in rf in desiccation, hypoxia, and hyperoxia selection variants (b).

Remarkably, in addition to the unidirectional changes in rf, we observed a highly significant increase in the rate of double crossovers, expressed as relaxation of positive interference and occurrence of negative interference.

A clinically significant positive correlation was found between the duration of hospital admission and both of the age of the patient and surgical interference (Fig. 3 and Table 2).