Sentence examples for significant level of agreement from inspiring English sources

Given that a significant level of agreement has been achieved, Siegel and Castellan suggest that the best overall ranking of the N objects can be obtained using their mean ranks averaged over the k judges [30].

A significant level of agreement was found between three of the listed authors.

The authors validated this approach by comparing their estimates to those taken from actual sampling performed at the ground level and found a statistically significant level of agreement.

In the lead-up to this meeting, there was a significant level of agreement about the low cost, cost-effective, feasible and evidence-informed interventions that could most effectively reduce the burden of NCDs in low- and middle-income countries [ 4, 5, 7, 9, 10].

Restrictions on sale of nicotine-containing e-cigarettes should be proposed for: Non-smokers Pregnant women Minors Non-smokers Pregnant women Minors The recommendations that did not reach a significant level of agreement (mean scores between 3.01 and 7.99) were used to create the second questionnaire.

Given the diversity of values and opinions in this country, these are significant levels of agreement and satisfaction, and we're very committed to ensuring that our ratings remain reflective of consumers' expectations about content.

RDme/ac were identified by computing a modified t-statistic for each probe and then significant levels of agreement across 1000 bp regions.

The questionnaire was subsequently tested for validity on UK sample groups of health information providers and members of various self-help groups, and was found to show significant levels of agreement on quality scores across groups (chance corrected agreement kappa = 0.56) and to have good face and content validity [ 18].

A significant, moderate to substantial level of agreement was found between the subjective ratings and the average objective hardness values (d = 0.467, p <0.001), but there was perfect agreement on just less than half of the occasions.

Similar comparative kappa values were observed between the iELISA, bELISA and FMIA, which demonstrated a significant level of testing agreement among the three assays.

There was significant level of interobserver agreement between the two raters for sniffing duration for both the first (r = 0.721, n = 20, P < 0.001) and second episodes (r = 0.923, n = 20, P < 0.05).