Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
significant lack of
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"significant lack of" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when you want to refer to an amount of something that is considerably less than what is considered normal or acceptable. For example, "There was a significant lack of support for the new policy, which led to its eventual downfall."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
The model presented no significant lack of fit (p = 0.253).
Science
There is a significant lack of well-informed critics writing about theatre in the United States.
News & Media
Most areas of California farm country have a significant lack of information about their groundwater use.
Academia
However, there is a significant lack of autoignition delay data in the low temperature regime.
Science
Your earlier research found a significant lack of transparency and reproducibility in biomedical research articles published between 2000-2014.
Academia
While poverty is prevalent on the reservation, there is also a significant lack of adequate and available housing.
When investigating this issue from the male point of view, we found a significant lack of awareness regarding these obstacles.
Chris Jennings, a White House aide, said he recognized that there was "quite significant lack of consensus" on those issues.
News & Media
There is a significant lack of indoor air quality research in low energy homes.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
2 human-written examples
No significant lack-of-fit was detected for this model (p=0.5155).
Science
However, we observed a significant lack-of-fit statistic (plack-of-fit = 0.021).
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "significant lack of", ensure the context clearly indicates what is deficient and why it matters. For example, "There is a "significant lack of" funding for this critical research project."
Common error
Avoid using "significant lack of" when the deficiency is minor or inconsequential. Opt for less emphatic phrasing if the "lack" doesn't have a substantial impact.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "significant lack of" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as a subject or object in a sentence. It describes a deficiency or absence of something, with "significant" intensifying the degree of the "lack". Ludwig AI confirms this phrase is correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
Science
43%
News & Media
41%
Academia
16%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "significant lack of" is a noun phrase used to emphasize a considerable deficiency. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in English, particularly in formal contexts like news, academia, and science. While alternatives like "substantial deficiency of" or "noticeable absence of" exist, "significant lack of" clearly conveys a noteworthy absence or shortage. Remember to use this phrase when you need to stress the importance of something missing, but be mindful of overstating the significance if the deficiency is minor.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
substantial deficiency of
Replaces "lack" with "deficiency", implying a notable shortage.
noticeable absence of
Substitutes "lack" with "absence", emphasizing the non-existence of something apparent.
marked inadequacy of
Replaces "lack" with "inadequacy", highlighting the insufficient nature of something.
considerable deficit of
Substitutes "lack" with "deficit", denoting a shortfall or deficiency, often in a quantifiable sense.
acute shortage of
Replaces "lack" with "shortage", emphasizing the scarcity of something.
pronounced scarcity of
Substitutes "lack" with "scarcity", highlighting the limited availability of something.
important dearth of
Replaces "lack" with "dearth", indicating a severe deficiency or shortage.
major insufficiency of
Replaces "lack" with "insufficiency", emphasizing the inadequate quantity or quality of something.
critical paucity of
Substitutes "lack" with "paucity", denoting a small or insufficient quantity of something crucial.
severe want of
Replaces "lack" with "want", an older expression meaning a deficiency or need.
FAQs
How can I use "significant lack of" in a sentence?
You can use "significant lack of" to point out a considerable deficiency or absence. For example, "The study revealed a "significant lack of" diversity in the tech industry."
What are some alternatives to "significant lack of"?
Some alternatives include "substantial deficiency of", "noticeable absence of", or "marked inadequacy of depending" on the context.
Is there a difference between "significant lack of" and "slight lack of"?
Yes, "significant lack of" indicates a considerable deficiency, while "slight lack of" suggests a minor or negligible deficiency. The former implies a more serious concern.
When is it appropriate to use "significant lack of" in formal writing?
It is appropriate to use "significant lack of" in formal writing when you need to emphasize a noteworthy deficiency that has important implications. Be sure that the context truly warrants the emphasis.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested