Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Despite their experience, the use of a standard questionnaire, training, supervision and educational meetings, we still detected significant interviewer effects.
There was a significant interviewer effect; one interviewer had a better distribution of answers among the SRH response alternatives than the other interviewer.
Taken together, this does tend to suggest that there was a significant interviewer effect however, it seems that the effect would have generally been such as to discourage explanations in terms of malingering, making the prominence of such explanations in the interviews more striking still.
Similar(57)
There was significant inter-interviewer variance in reported rates for each outcome.
Of the 17 interactions, two were statistically significant (p <.05): interviewer 10 provided worse (higher scores) ratings overall, but also significantly worse for inner city ratings; interviewer 13 provided better (lower) ratings overall, but they were significantly worse (higher scores) in the city ratings.
There were no significant effects of interviewers (P=0.2) or framing (P=0.9) on preferences.
In a sample of primary care patients, long-term (1 to 3 year) improvement in depressive and anxiety symptoms was associated with significant improvement in interviewer-rated social disability [ 8].
However this was not a significant problem as the interviewer is a Nigerian national and was familiar enough with the environment to navigate it well.
For eight domains of the MOS-HIV, we did not find statistically significant differences between the interviewer- and self- administered formats (Table 2).
However, for the determination of food and beverage intake for the assessment of the risk of obesity in young children, parents' reports using a food consumption and physical activity questionnaire demonstrated similar results to a 24-hour dietary log administered by an interviewer (non-significant p-value) [ 6].
Interview your Interviewer.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com